My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
11B Public Hearings
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2022
>
Packet 06212022
>
11B Public Hearings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2022 1:20:53 PM
Creation date
6/28/2022 1:00:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
6/21/2022
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2022-085 Approving Third Addendum and Planning Entitlements
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Reso 2022-086 2nd amendment to DDA
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
502
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN LEANDRO SHORELINE DEVELOPMENT EIR ADDENDUM PROJECT <br />CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br /> <br />May 2022 Page 59 <br />transportation impacts that include, but are not limited to, “vehicle miles traveled (VMT), VMT per capita, <br />automobile trip generation rates, or automobile trips generated.”17 18 OPR selected VMT as the preferred <br />metric with July 1st, 2020 as the statewide implementation date. Agencies may opt-in use of new metrics <br />prior to that date.19 <br /> <br />The City has not formally adopted a significance criterion, however, the First Addendum found that the <br />trip generation analysis for the modifications under the First Addendum would generate less trips than <br />the Original Project, the VMT for the Modified Project would likely be lower than that for the Original <br />Project. Based on this net reduction in trips and reduction in VMT, the Modified Project consisting of 6 <br />additional residential units will result the same or less impacts than were disclosed in the Certified EIR <br />and evaluated in the First Addendum. Furthermore, it is likely the same Certified EIR mitigations will still <br />apply, though without further detailed analysis, it is undetermined which of those mitigations would no <br />longer be necessary. However, for the purpose of this Addendum, the assumption is that all mitigation <br />measures shall continue to be required of and implemented for the Modified Project.Therefore, the <br />Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a substantial increase in magnitude of the existing <br />impacts putting it in conflict or inconsistency with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b). <br />TRAF-c. <br />The Certified EIR and the First Addendum found that the Original Project and Approved Project would <br />have no impact from hazards from incompatible uses. This would remain for the Modified Project. <br />However, the Certified EIR found that the location of the proposed northern driveway of the North Golf <br />Course Residential component of the Original Project presents a potential sight distance challenge for <br />cars pulling out of the driveway and would constitute a significant impact. Implementation of Mitigation <br />Measure TRAF-4A would reduce this impact to less than significant by removing the North Golf Course <br />northern driveway from the project plans. This Mitigation Measure would also be implemented for the <br />Modified Project. The Certified EIR also found that the proposed southern driveway of the North Golf <br />Course Residential component would potentially result in a design hazard due to its location in relation to <br />the proposed Monarch Bay Drive and Mulford Point Drive intersection. Implementation of Mitigation <br />Measure TRAF-4B in coordination with TRAF-1D would reduce this impact to less than significant by <br />moving the Southern Driveway of the North Golf Course residential component to the north, to form a <br />standard four-legged intersection. These Mitigation Measures would also be implemented for the <br />Modified Project. Furthermore, no new design features are proposed. Therefore, with the <br />implementation of these Mitigation Measures, the Modified Project would not result in a new impact or a <br />substantial increase in magnitude of the existing impacts as they relate to increased hazards due to a <br />geometric design feature or incompatible uses. <br /> <br />17 Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. 2020. Available online at http://opr.ca.gov/ceqa/updates/sb-743/, accessed <br />January 22, 2020. <br />18 California Legislative Information. 2013. Available online at <br />http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140SB743, accessed January 22, 2020. <br />19 California Department of Transportation. 2020. Available online at https://dot.ca.gov/programs/transportation- <br />planning/office-of-smart-mobility-climate-change/sb-743, accessed January 22, 2020.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.