My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
MO 2002-055 to 2002-060
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Minute Orders
>
2002
>
MO 2002-055 to 2002-060
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2022 12:14:38 PM
Creation date
7/12/2022 11:51:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Minute Order
Document Date (6)
12/31/2002
Retention
PERM
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
292
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STAFF ANALYSIS <br />Land Use <br />Although the proposed use itself would be considered a permitted use under the IG zoning <br />district, the Applicant is applying for a rezone to IG-Planned Development Overlay District and <br />for approval of a Planned Development. The Planned Development designation is warranted, due <br />to the fact that the baseline assumption for the traffic report indicated a minimal amount of office <br />use (which typically generates more traffic than industrial uses) and the PD would allow <br />placement of a condition limiting the project's office square footage. The rezoning of the project <br />site from IG District to IG-PD District will allow greater discretionary review of proposed uses <br />and improvements to ensure that the new tenant/use will be compatible with the existing area. <br />The applicant has agreed to additional conditions of approval that would preclude FedEx Ground <br />from expanding (beyond the small expansion which is shown on plans) either on their own <br />parcel or to other parcels within the business park development, and further, would require that <br />any future proposed modification to allowed uses in the Planned Development be reviewed by <br />both the Planning Commission and the City Council. The Zoning Code currently allows <br />administrative approval by staff or Planning Commission of Planned Development <br />modifications. <br />Per the consensus of the Planning Commission at the October 1 work session, laboratories and <br />research and development uses have been reclassified from permitted uses to administrative uses, <br />and food processing, limited; catering services; and maintenance and repair services have been <br />reclassified from permitted uses to conditional uses. <br />Development standards for the project, including minimum lot area (5,000 square feet required, <br />.98 acre proposed for smallest lot), landscaping (5% of site minimum), maximum height (35 feet <br />allowed, 32 feet at parapet proposed), maximum FAR (1.0 allowed, 0.31 proposed), minimum <br />site landscaping (project conditioned to required minimum 5% for each lot) and parking <br />(minimum lspace/1,000 square feet required for general industry; 1 space/1,500 square feet for <br />parcel processing centers) are in conformance with the underlying IG zoning district. <br />Tentative Map Revision <br />In the interim since the last Planning Commission public hearing, the Tentative Subdivision. Map <br />has been modified. The change includes a small shift of the proposed private roadway to the east <br />in order to preserve a small isolated area of wetlands. This change was requested by the Regional <br />Water Quality Control Board during their review of the project. In shifting the road <br />approximately ten (10) feet to the east, the lots that front the private road (Lots B, C, E and G) no <br />longer maintain the required 20-foot building setback (10 feet, plus one foot for each additional <br />two feet of building height in excess of 20 feet). These building all now show a setback of ten <br />(10) feet from the front property line. This deviation from underlying development standards can <br />be approved as part of the Planned Development process. Staff believes that the small decrease <br />in building setback and landscaping would not adversely affect the development. <br />PLN2002-00031— Bayside Business Park October 10, 2002 <br />Planning Commission Page 4 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.