MO 2001-021 to 2001-025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

1% Driveway Policy Statement 2 January 26, 2001 the top of the driveway. In some areas of the City no driveways were constructed. Instead, the developers built rolled curbs, also with 6-8" height differential to the street grade. Because of the large ground clearance of the cars manufactured during that period, the aforementioned practices did not present a problem and worked very well. As time progressed, the condition of these streets deteriorated. Some of them were rehabilitated by overlaying them with asphalt. While the practice extended the useful life of the street and reduced the height differential between the top of driveways and street/gutter grade, thus benefiting the subsequently manufactured cars with much less ground clearance, it created drainage problems in areas of the City. Because San Leandro relies primarily on the street surface for drainage, changing the official street grade on a particular street section created drainage problems in most street sections within the particular drainage grid. For the past three years, the City has been fortunate to receive federal and State grants of over 5 million dollars, which has allowed us to start reconstructing street sections that are severely damaged beyond the ability of any other rehabilitation method to effect any repair. Implementing these reconstruction projects present the City the opportunity to not only construct a "new" street section, but also affords it the benefit of restoring these streets to the official street grade and thus start the process of reducing the drainage problems around the City. The shortcoming to this reconstruction is that it reinstates the relatively large high differential between the top of the very old driveways and the street, which can make it difficult for the prevailing low -base car to negotiate. In cases where these old driveways had been replaced by City standard driveways, this difficulty does not exist. Over the past few years, the City street reconstruction program has covered large sections of the City. Much of the work has taken place on streets with old driveways or rolled curbs. Property owners on these streets have been given the opportunity to retain their existing driveway or rolled curb with the attendant driving difficulty or replace the old one with the current City standard driveway at the property owner's expense. While some property owners have chosen to have the City replace their driveway through the Sidewalk Program, quite a few did not, citing the significant cost of driveway replacement as their reason. Many property owners feel that the City should pay for their driveway replacement. Staff had declined to pay for this cost in view of the current City policy and state law that makes it the property owner's responsibility. DISCUSSION The entire City Council on December 18, 2000 referred this issue to the Adhoc Committee for resolution. As a result of the Adhoc Committee's work, a policy ISIV4