Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF SAN LEAI .—O <br />' APPROVED AND FORWARDED <br />TO CITY COUNCIL <br />STAFF REPORT <br />DATE: <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />SUBJECT: <br />July 30, 1998 <br />John Jermanis, City Manager <br />Jim O'Leary, Assistant Finance Director <br />JJo ermanis <br />C. anager <br />M o <br />?8-14(f5g-oz g <br />(1051) I I (R3� //Z1/.,nIa <br />User Fee Service Rate Increases for Refuse, Sewer, Recycling, and Storm Water <br />SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION <br />Resolutions approving adjustments to a number of Enterprise Fund user service charges have been <br />prepared for the City Council's August 3, 1998 agenda. The existing user fee charges for refuse, <br />sewer service, recycling, and storm water were reviewed during the preparation of the 1998-99 City <br />Council Approved Budget. As a result, rates for these services require upward adjustments to support <br />the current service levels. Although the analysis indicates the need for even higher rates, the proposed <br />increases are reasonably limited (ranging for residential services between $.30 and $1.40 per month <br />for each service) for 1998-99. <br />City Council approvals of the resolutions covering the necessary rate increases are recommended. <br />Rates must be forwarded to the Alameda County Auditor -Controller for the 1998-99 secured property <br />tax bills by August 10. <br />Public hearings on August 3 will allow for public testimony regarding the rate increases. Proposition <br />218, although known as the Right to Vote on Taxes Act, makes special provisions for the imposition <br />of property related user fees. Unlike the requirement for taxes, there is no election requirement for <br />these fees. In the past, rate increases would have been implemented by ordinance after a public <br />hearing. However, under Proposition 218 the notice and public hearing requirements have changed. <br />The Finance Department provided written notice to all property owners and tenants potentially affected <br />by the increases. Under the protest provisions of Proposition 218, over ten thousand protests are <br />required to preclude City Council approval of the changes. <br />BACKGROUND <br />Over the past five years, operating cost increases in three of the City's Enterprise Fund activities, <br />Water Pollution Control, Refuse and Storm Water, have been offset by technology improvement and <br />productivity increases. During this period, stable rates have benefited industrial, commercial, and <br />residential users. The existing user fee charges were reviewed during the preparation of the 1998-99 <br />City Council Approved Budget. As a result of this analysis, rates for these three funds require upward <br />1.5 <br />