Laserfiche WebLink
1862 Edgehill Ct. Appeal <br />August 7, 1997 <br />DISCUSSION <br />On June 2, 1997, staff received a complaint that three limousines were routinely parked in front of <br />the house located at 1862 Edgehill Court. The complainant was concerned about the appearance of <br />the limousines on the street and that business activities were being conducted out of the home. <br />Inspections of the site revealed a stretch -like van, a stretch Mercedes Benz and a stretch Lincoln. <br />Staff contacted the property owners who indicated that the limousines were not currently being <br />used for business activities and that they planned to eventually construct a new driveway which <br />would accommodate the vehicles. Staff could fmd no evidence that a limousine business is <br />currently being conducted from the home. <br />Staff continued to receive complaints regarding the limousines and took action to require the <br />removal of the Mercedes & Lincoln limousines which are parked on the street. Due to the incline <br />of the steep driveway, the limousines cannot be parked on the driveway. The van was not pursued <br />as a violation because it is generally parked in the driveway and it is no different than a permitted <br />recreational vehicle. <br />An Administrative Hearing before the Community Preservation Hearing Board was scheduled for <br />July 16, 1997. Staff then received a petition requesting removal of the limousines. A copy of the <br />petition is attached. You will note that the petition was addressed to the attention of the City <br />Council and references a July 16 City Council meeting. The petitioners were actually referring to <br />the July 16 Administrative Hearing before the Community Preservation Hearing Board. <br />COMMUNITY PRESERVATION HEARING BOARD ACTION <br />Mr. and Mrs. DeLaCruz attended the administrative hearing. After hearing all testimony, the <br />hearing board found the condition to be a public nuisance and required the removal of one <br />limousine by August 1, 1997, and the second limousine by July 16, 1998. The Board indicated that <br />the limousines could be parked at the property, if they were parked on a legal off-street parking <br />area. A copy of the Findings of Fact and Order are attached. On July 22, 1997, the property owners <br />filed an appeal of the hearing board's decision. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Staff Recommendation to Community Preservation Hearing Board <br />At the July 16, 1997 Administrative Hearing, staff recommended that the Hearing Board require the <br />removal of the limousines based on the following finding: <br />A reasonable determination can be made that the use of the public street for <br />the purpose of parking two stretch limousines is so out of harmony with the <br />standards of the properties in the vicinity so as to cause substantial <br />diminution of the enjoyment, use and property values of such properties, <br />and therefore violates Section 3-1-205(b)(1) of the Community <br />is Preservation Ordinance. <br />4�� <br />