My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
7B Action
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2022
>
Packet 07112022
>
7B Action
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2025 2:08:26 PM
Creation date
7/13/2022 10:01:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
7/11/2022
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2022-117 Authorizing Agreement with Intregrassure
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
officers, which may not reach the level of substantiated misconduct 1. We will also be reviewing <br />supervisory oversight in each incident to determine whether the supervision was adequate and <br />appropriate. Additionally, the IPA team will regularly assess the SLPD complaint database to evaluate the <br />complaint classification based on the nature of the complaints and evaluate whether investigation <br />timelines are being met and other related compliance issues. <br />The IPA team will attempt to understand the staff’s view of any shortcomings in the process. We <br />anticipate that we would be working with IA throughout our tenure, and after our initial meetings would <br />be discussing, on an on-going basis, any changes to the process which would result in process <br />improvement. <br />If the investigation was conducted by an external investigator, the IPA team will also provide input into <br />the scope of work of the investigator. <br />Moreover, we will be reviewing the disciplinary system to determine whether, with respect to any <br />substantiated misconduct case, appropriate discipline is being utilized to both correct behavior and <br />ultimately protect the City from potential liability. This will require reviewing the involved officer’s <br />disciplinary records to assess whether the level of discipline assessed balanced and prior misconduct with <br />the gravity of the misconduct. <br />In preparation for the written evaluation, when there is a question over the final conclusion, including the <br />appropriate level of discipline, the IPA team will confer among themselves and with the Internal Affairs <br />staff to make sure differing perspectives are considered. In any instance in which we believe there are <br />additional investigative steps that should be taken or disagree with findings and/or discipline, we will <br />make that fact known. To the extent that any further investigation is required, we will make such <br />recommendation to those working on the matter, and if necessary, to the Police Chief or their designee. <br />In any case in which such recommendation is not accepted, we will, after discussion with the Police Chief, <br />make such recommendation in writing to the City Manager. <br />Throughout this process, it is inevitable certain trends will emerge regarding specific violations and/or <br />uses of force. These trends will be identified and discussed with appropriate parties in a timely manner to <br />provide prompt remediation as necessary. <br />During this process, when appropriate, a team member will attend administrative investigative interviews <br />and ask relevant questions to the witnesses to obtain critical pieces of the investigation when necessary, <br />in a manner that will not disrupt the timeliness or violate the Public Safety Officer’s Procedural Bill of <br />Rights Act (“POBOR”). <br /> <br /> <br />1 See Additional Services – Early Intervention section below. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.