MO 1996-006 to 1996-010 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Mike Oliver -3- January 31, 1996 Comments raised at the Board of Zoning Adjustments Meeting At the public hearing on this matter before the Board of Zoning Adjustments on December 7, 1995, the local property owners and residents provided the following comments: • Staff read the letter of support (attached) from Maria Palos, 13917 Seagate Dr., into the record. • Roger Barragan, 13170 Neptune Drive, spoke in favor the of the project. • James Robbins, 14011 Seagate Drive, raised concerns about the amount of traffic the project would generate. • Lou Filipovich, 15376 Laverne Drive, supported the project overall but thought the view would be disturbed, the development fee for street improvements was high, and the condition regarding truck hauling should be changed to truck loading. • Wayne Kislingbury, 2610 West Avenue 134th, raised concerns about the third story of one of the buildings and the loss of a portion of the boat launching parking lot. Two representatives from local labor organizations spoke in opposition to the project. • Barry Luboviski, Secretary/Treasurer to the Building and Construction Trades Council of Alameda County, spoke in opposition questioning the adequacy of the environmental review in regards to the additional story and traffic. He requested a new negative declaration or an environmental impact report with a new traffic study. He also offered his view on the use of union labor. • Gabriel Hernandez, Staff Director for the Hotel and Restaurant Employees Local 2850, spoke in opposition to the project questioning the adequacy of the environmental review answers to the Environmental Checklist Form regarding impacts on the health and well-being of members of the community. He also offered his view on the use of union labor. The Board of Zoning Adjustments comments are contained in the attached minutes of the meeting and include the following topics: Marina Boulevard and Doolittle Drive intersection, sewer capacity, adequacy of parking, weekday and weekend occupancy rates, size of conference room, noticing of project, length of occupant stay, number of employees, third story, truck hauling, and Bay Conservation and Development Commission review. The Board received clarification on these topics and approved the project as recommended by staff, including the environmental review. 17�