Laserfiche WebLink
Mike Oliver -2- February 27, 1996 <br />driving to the Residence Inn and 100% of the peak hour trips would be driving from the <br />Residence Inn. Traffic levels of service at Fairway and Doolittle are even better than at Marina <br />and Doolittle, so project traffic would not affect this intersection either. Based on these <br />assumptions and 1995 traffic counts at the intersections under consideration, the Residence Inn <br />project would not change the level of service at any of the intersections. The traffic study <br />projects that there would be one to two additional cars per minute for two-way traffic during <br />the p.m. peak period (4:30 to 5:30). At full build -out of the Residence Inn project, there still <br />would be 50% more capacity before traffic volumes and delays at the Marina -Doolittle and <br />Fairway -Doolittle intersections reach unsatisfactory levels. <br />Currently, Marina Boulevard and Fairway Drive are listed as arterials in the Master Plan of <br />City Streets. In the proposed Master Plan of City Streets, the two are classified as residential <br />arterials west of Doolittle Drive. The difference between a regular arterial and residential <br />arterial is that the latter attempts to maintain a maximum speed of 25 mph through the use of <br />neighborhood traffic controls. Neither type of arterial classification imposes an upper bound <br />limit on the amount of vehicle trips. <br />All projects, regardless of their size, contribute to cumulative traffic impacts. The City's <br />Development Fees for Street Improvements (DFSI) has been established as a means of <br />mitigating a project's cumulative impact on the transportation system. The City uses DFSI, <br />funds for general traffic improvements related to traffic growth such as upgrades to the City's <br />busiest intersections. For the Marriott Residence Inn project, the developer will be required <br />to pay a DFSI for $64,483.00 (Condition of Approval V.F.). <br />Attached to this report is a peer review by the firm of CCS Planning and Engineering. The <br />results of the independent firm's study concur with the traffic study conducted by the City's <br />Transportation Administrator (also attached). <br />Parking <br />The zoning requirement is 1.1 off-street parking spaces per guest room. Therefore, the <br />proposed, 122-room Residence Inn would require 135 parking spaces. There is parking for 98 <br />cars within the leased area and approximately 102 on -street parking spaces available for <br />overflow parking on the entire length of South Dike Road. <br />The peak periods when overflow parking for the Residence Inn would be necessary would <br />coincide with the low activity days for the Marina. The peak period for the proposed <br />Residence Inn is during the week; the Marina's peak period is on weekends. This relationship <br />provides an opportunity for reciprocal parking arrangements. <br />42 <br />