Laserfiche WebLink
property managers clean up litter (regardless of source); that he has surveyed Harold <br />Avenue for impacted parking problems and could find none; <br />Tenants of the complex also testified to the necessity for vehicular access via <br />Harold Avenue because of the traffic hazards created by the high volume and speed of <br />traffic on Washington Avenue (as well as the difficulty in making a safe, left hand <br />turn onto Washington Avenue). They challenged the assertion that there is speeding <br />on Harold Avenue and noted speeding is precluded by the street's length, the tire <br />spikes and the slow opening of the gate. Tenants noted that the pedestrian gate <br />provides a safer and more convenient route of travel than having to exit and enter the <br />complex via Washington Avenue. <br />At the conclusion of the meeting, the Planning Commission voted to refer the <br />matter to the City Council with a recommendation to adopt the recommendations of <br />Staff noted in the July 5, 1996 report except that the Commission recommended: <br />The pedestrian gate be kept open (assuming it requires a key for entry from <br />Harold Avenue) and functions properly; <br />The City should work with the neighbors to study the feasibility of speed <br />bumps; and <br />The City should study the feasibility of limiting the hours of accessibility to <br />both the pedestrian and vehicular gate. <br />On October 7, 1996, the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency held a <br />X <br />