My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
10I Consent
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2022
>
Packet 09062022
>
10I Consent
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2025 3:23:51 PM
Creation date
9/26/2022 12:31:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
9/6/2022
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2022-137 CSA Indigo Hammond Playle Architects Amdt
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
File Number: 22-438 <br />As in any complex building renovation project , there have been owner requests for changes, <br />unforeseen conditions, and design changes during construction. Additionally, on this project there <br />have also been utility and contractor delays during construction. While these items are commonly <br />encountered, they have had an uncommonly significant impact on the schedule for this project. <br />The exact impact of each category hasn’t yet been determined , but the cumulative impact is <br />known. The project was originally envisioned for completion Summer 2020; the work is now <br />scheduled for completion by Spring 2023, a delay of up to 33 months. DLF will present a <br />complete analysis of the delay for review before their contract is closed out and the City will <br />evaluate that data to determine which party is responsible for delay. It is likely that each party will <br />have responsibility for some portion of the delay. When delay is assigned to a 3rd party , such as <br />a utility company, there is no recourse and each party must cover their own costs. Until <br />responsibility is determined DLF is covering delay costs of the construction team and the City is <br />covering delay costs incurred by the owner’s team , including Indigo. <br />Construction is scheduled to finish up to 33 months later than originally scheduled. The cost for <br />staff to manage and inspect construction averages $13,000/month resulting in additional project <br />costs of $429,000. Over that same period , the increased cost for Indigo, and their <br />sub-consultants, is projected to be $200,000. <br />Additionally, owner requests, unforeseen conditions, and design changes that may have <br />contributed to the construction delay have also contributed to higher than anticipated change <br />orders. At contract award , the project budget contained a change order contingency of 15% for <br />the $6,268,000 construction contract; however, change orders are currently projected to total 20% <br />of the original contract, an increase of 5% or $313,000. A summary of change orders to date is <br />attached to this Staff Report . <br />The sum of the staff costs, consultant costs, and increased change order costs listed above, <br />$942,000, is needed from the CIP budget to complete construction of the project. <br />Analysis <br />Project completion has been significantly delayed and the responsibility for delay has not yet <br />been determined. Indigo continues to attend weekly meetings, review work, and respond to field <br />issues; their assistance is critical to successful completion of the project. Architectural services <br />are needed to complete the work and there is no other architectural firm with the required project <br />knowledge. <br />DLF is likely responsible for and will be assessed liquidated damages for some portion of the <br />delay. The City is also likely responsible and will be required to pay DLF for costs related to <br />some portion of the delay. The magnitude of each of these items is unknown and , therefore, have <br />been excluded from the current project cost estimate in the financial impact section of this report. <br />Staff recommends that additional funding for the project come from two sources, CIP fund <br />balance and existing CIP expenditure accounts. The City has existing appropriations in CIP <br />Page 2 City of San Leandro Printed on 8/31/2022
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.