Laserfiche WebLink
2 EXISTING CONDITIONS <br /> San Leandro Crosstown Corridors Study 2-12 <br />Williams Street <br />Williams Street provides basic accommodations for pedestrians up and down <br />the corridor, with an almost complete, if narrow, sidewalk network. In general, <br />community members note that the exposed and industrial character of the <br />corridor is not welcoming to pedestrians. Many comments also note the need <br />for enhanced pedestrian safety in the school zone. Key observations, <br />confirmed through community engagement, are described in Appendix B <br />and include the following: <br />• Pick-up and drop-off in school zones create a high-stress situation, <br />with crosswalks frequently blocked despite lots of students walking <br />to and from school. <br />• Missing curb ramps and sidewalk gaps, including near railroad <br />crossings, limit accessibility. <br />• The sidewalks can be hot in the summer with limited shade trees and <br />are too narrow if passing another pedestrian on the sidewalk or <br />walking side-by-side, particularly near utility poles and other <br />obstructions. <br />Pedestrian Safety <br />Ten years of injury collision data from SWITRS (accessed via TIMS) was <br />analyzed along Williams Street. Between 2009 and 2019, seven pedestrian and <br />five bicyclist injury collisions occurred on Williams Street. Two of those <br />collisions were severe injury collisions, and none were fatal. A quarter of those <br />collisions (3 collisions) involved a school-aged child. Bicycle and pedestrian <br />injury collision locations with severity are shown in Figure 2-4. Speed is also <br />an issue on the corridor, with speed as a primary collision factor in 21% of all <br />injury collisions. <br /> <br />3 Uncontrolled crosswalk recommendations are based on guidance from the FHWA <br />Guide for Improving Safety at Uncontrolled Crossing Locations. <br />Pedestrian Collision Types <br />43% of pedestrian collisions (3 collisions) were caused by a driver violating <br />the pedestrian right of way. These types of collisions primarily occurred when <br />a driver failed to yield to a pedestrian that was: <br />• Crossing in an uncontrolled crosswalk <br />• Crossing at a signalized intersection with permitted left-turns across <br />the crosswalk <br />The other half of pedestrian collisions typically had pedestrians at fault <br />where the person walking was under 18 and traffic signal or sign violations <br />by drivers. <br />Crossing Opportunities <br />Uncontrolled Crosswalks <br />Given the 9,822 ADT and 31 MPH prevailing speed, high-visibility crosswalks, <br />advance yield markings, curb extensions, and rapid rectangular flashing <br />beacons (RRFBs) are potential safety countermeasures for the corridor.3 The <br />City has invested in these enhancements at some uncontrolled crosswalks, <br />such as at both Joyce Avenue and Dolly Avenue which have RRFBs that increase <br />pedestrian visibility when activated. <br />However, even at these intersections, community concerns about drivers <br />yielding to crossing pedestrians remain, and near bell times drivers picking up <br />students were observed sometimes blocking sight lines at crosswalks while <br />waiting in their vehicles. As a result, there is need to look to additional <br />enhancements to encourage driver yielding and maintain sight lines at <br />crosswalks. Further enhancements to the existing improvements at Joyce and <br />Dolly Avenues through permanent, more robust curb extensions and traffic <br />calming in the vicinity can help improve these crossing locations. DRA <br />F <br />T