Laserfiche WebLink
January 31, 2024 <br />Risk-Based Evaluation for Reuse of Stockpile Material for the Proposed Treatment <br />Wetland Project – City of San Leandro Water Pollution Control Plant <br /> <br /> 20240131-Terraphase-SanLeandro-TreatmentWetland-Risk-TM-DRAFT.docx Page 3 of 10 <br /> <br />Additional Sludge Sampling <br />In October of 2023, Terraphase collected 10 sludge samples from the central and eastern portions of the <br />polishing pond. The samples were collected on a grid, with five samples each in the central portion and <br />eastern portions of the polishing pond. No additional samples were collected from the western portion <br />of the pond. The samples were collected using a plastic tube, which was lowered from the side of a raft. <br />Depending on the substrate, approximately 6 and 12 inches of sludge was collected. Following sampler <br />dewatering, each sludge sample was placed in a plastic tub, where it was manually homogenized using a <br />stainless-steel trowel or similar tool. The samples were then placed in laboratory-provided jars. The jars <br />were labeled and placed in a cooler for transport to the analytical laboratory, Enthalpy Analytical, under <br />chain-of-custody procedures. Each of the samples was analyzed for: <br />• Title 22 Metals [United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method 6010] <br />• Deionized-water-extracted (DI-WET) metals [USEPA Methods 1311 modified and 6010] <br />• Total petroleum hydrocarbons [USEPA Method 8015] <br />• Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) [USEPA Method 8082] <br />• Organochlorine pesticides [USEPA Method 8081] <br />• Moisture content [ASTM D2216] <br />Tables A-1 (stockpiled soil) and A-2 (storage pond sludge), which are provided in Attachment A, present <br />the sampling results for each media. Each table provides a sample-by-sample comparison to the <br />following potentially relevant generic screening levels: <br />• Wetland Foundation Material Concentration Guidelines (SFBRWQCB 2000) <br />• Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs; SFBRWQCB 2019) for the following scenarios: <br />− Soil Direct Exposure [Construction Worker] <br />− Soil Leaching to Groundwater [Drinking Water] <br />− Soil Leaching to Groundwater [Non-Drinking Water] <br />− Aquatic Habitat Goal [Fresh Water Ecotox] <br />− Aquatic Habitat Goal [Saltwater Ecotox] <br />The identification of chemical concentrations above these screening levels does not necessarily mean <br />that unacceptable risk could exist. Rather, screening levels help identify sampling results that may <br />warrant additional evaluation. They provide a means for reviewing datasets by segregating <br />concentrations that indicate a higher potential for health significance from those that indicate a low <br />potential. In this case, they have been used to help understand the nature and extent of chemicals in <br />stockpiled soil and sludge and determine which chemicals be considered site-related COPC. <br />Based upon this screening, the following chemicals were detected in one or more samples at <br />concentrations greater than these generic screening levels and are considered to be COPC in this risk <br />evaluation.