My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
LHMP Consulting Services Agreement (CSA) v3 FINAL DOCUSIGN
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agreements
>
2024
>
LHMP Consulting Services Agreement (CSA) v3 FINAL DOCUSIGN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2025 10:44:33 AM
Creation date
11/5/2024 4:45:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
Document Date (6)
10/4/2024
Retention
PERM
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
31 <br /> <br /> <br />responsible entity, estimated costs and a completion timeline, the hazard/s addressed, and mitigation <br />category. The FEMA Local Mitigation Planning Handbook recommends four (4) categories of mitigation <br />actions: <br />• Local plans and regulations <br />• Structure and infrastructure projects <br />• Natural systems protection <br />• Education and awareness programs <br />NPA shall prepare a matrix that summarizes mitigation actions, priority, responsible party(ies), funding <br />mechanisms, benefit/cost, and technical feasibility similar to the example given in the FEMA Local <br />Mitigation Planning Handbook (March 2023). <br />NPA shall organize the potential mitigation actions by the LHMP objectives. See Table 4 for examples. <br />Table 4: Potential Mitigation Actions 2024 <br /> <br />Goal Action <br />Item # <br />Action Description Mitigation Type Related <br />Hazards <br />Implementing <br />Organizations <br /> <br />Goal 1: Protect 1.1 Analyze critical City Infrastructure Seismic Public Works <br />life, property, and facilities and conduct <br />reduce potential seismic retrofits where <br />injuries from needed. <br />natural caused <br />hazards <br /> <br />1.2 Assess the fuel storage <br />capacity of emergency <br />Infrastructure Seismic Public Works <br /> generators at key <br /> infrastructure and <br /> increase it to provide 72 <br /> hours of continuous <br /> operation. <br /> <br />Evaluate and Prioritize Potential Mitigation Actions <br />NPA shall use a two-step process to evaluate potential mitigation items to best meet the needs of the City <br />for reduction of hazard loss. FEMA requires that one criterion of the evaluation and prioritization process <br />be benefit-cost review. The Planning Team must consider the benefits that would result from a mitigation <br />action versus the cost. This does not mean a full benefit-cost analysis (BCA), using the FEMA BCA <br />program, but a planning level assessment of whether the costs are reasonable compared to the probable <br />benefits. Cost estimates do not have to be exact but can be based on experience and judgment. <br />Docusign Envelope ID: C52B82D1-BCAD-4260-AF1B-3FCC857FC38E
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.