CSA Good City Company 01092025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Page 26 of 65 • Prepare preliminary mode share and/or vehicle miles travelled (VMT) reduction targets together with the City and BART. These targets will be the baseline input for the development capacity tool. • Develop and test range of anticipated transportation mode share proportions based on driving trips, level of BART replacement parking and historical mode choice data. • Establish existing road capacity conditions by performing level of service (LOS) analysis in Synchro for up to 10 priority intersections. This will help identify early trade-offs, KPI ranges, and thresholds. Roadway capacity for development program alternatives will be tested in 5.1C. • Identify and list elements and criteria that will influence the vehicle parking strategy: parking demand and user preferences (e.g. opportunities and risks to changing behaviors, TDM programs for TOD residents and users and other influencing measures), design options and relative costs (e.g. structure, podium, surface), technology (e.g. stackers, puzzle, fully automated), operations, maintenance, phasing, policy, and regulations (e.g. parking rates, shared parking, district parking). • Identify and list TDM strategies that prove most effective in the model to control parking supply and vehicle trips. The strategies will be assessed based on criteria such as vehicle trip reduction potential, ease of implementation, order of magnitude cost. • The travel demand information incorporated into the development capacity tool will be translated into vehicle traffic (Single Occupancy Vehicles - SOV, carpool, bus, etc.), for the defined access scenarios. Traffic within the development capacity tool will be analyzed at a preliminary level by determining V/C (volume over capacity) ratios, which will help to understand the traffic impact in the street grid of Sub-Area 1. Mode share for the area can be treated as an input target (e.g., we want a X% SOV mode share as a target), or as an output (e.g., the trips coming into the site result in a X% SOV mode share). • BKF will prepare a cost estimation tool as part of the Development Capacity Tool to develop and analyze subprojects within the plan. The tool will begin by determining subproject scopes (i.e. crossings, streets, trail, parks, etc.) with high level ROM costs. As more information is available and design furthered, a more refined and detailed estimate will be provided for those elements. RRER will supplement Arup’s analysis by providing retailer parking and circulation criteria (preferred locations and number of stalls). Deliverables: • Preliminary Development Capacity Tool (Spreadsheet) • Draft Parking and TDM Strategy Memo • Final Parking and TDM Strategy Memo • One section of the Design Framework Presentation • One category of design criteria for the Evaluation Tool spreadsheet Docusign Envelope ID: 885601F4-01B5-4FAB-A341-08EBC29876AA