CSA Good City Company 01092025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Page 32 of 65 This includes intersection configuration and roadway improvements, as well as identifying preferred locations for the new crossing at the Estudillo Channel. • Analyze and review the scenarios’ performance according to the selected KPIs and prepare a recommended set of parking strategy scenarios for the Sub-Area 1. development, as agreed with the City and BART. This analysis will allow for an iterative process to refine the scenario results. • Determine preliminary functional requirements for station and development access for each of the scenarios, based on the criteria defined in Task 4. These functional requirements will inform the siting parameters for the access infrastructure. • Prepare cross-sections and preliminary street alignments that result from the access scenarios, accommodating sufficient ROW to accommodate active transportation (cyclists and pedestrians), accommodating transit priority. The work developed will be based on the NACTO design guidelines. • Use the analysis results from the parking model and development capacity tool to test the priority intersections for future conditions. Each of the up to 10 priority intersections will be further analyzed in Synchro to compare existing and future level of service (LOS) to identify potential mitigations for the preferred plan alternative/development plan. Each of the 10 priority intersections will be analyzed for up to two future conditions scenarios: with no mitigations and with an identified potential mitigation. Note 1: The traffic information from the EIR includes traffic counts from 2015, 2016, and 2017. The City of San Leandro has recently collected traffic counts for speed surveys. We assume that this will be the baseline information for our work. If the City requests updated traffic counts, these would be performed as budget allows via Optional Task 3.O.2. Note 2: Mitigations to improve LOS can conflict with human-scale urban design. Our team will be ready to evaluate trade-offs to recommend optimal solutions for the Development Plan. Deliverables: • Summary of the results of the access scenario analysis, including recommendations for preferred scenario. This will be prepared as an internal memo. • Plans, cross-sections, and diagrams developed in conjunction with alternative base plans. • Preferred Development Plan Alternatives Traffic Analysis Memo (Internal) • Utility Concept Technical Memo 5.2 Preliminary Development Plan Alternatives Three preliminary design alternatives will test different levels of development intensity and public benefit. Alternatives will be provided in illustrative formats. Alternatives will consider the physical site constraints that include buildings, property boundaries, creek crossing, roadways, BART Station entry, and similar items. Docusign Envelope ID: 885601F4-01B5-4FAB-A341-08EBC29876AA