My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8B Public
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2025
>
Packet 20250505
>
8B Public
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2025 9:28:03 AM
Creation date
9/15/2025 10:35:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
Document Date (6)
5/5/2025
Retention
Perm
Document Relationships
Reso 2025-042 Rejecting Appeal (880 Doolittle)
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2025
Reso 2025-043 Certifying EIR (880 Doolittle)
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5995
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of San Leandro <br />880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project <br /> <br />1-4 <br />Commenter Comment/Request Summary <br />Where the Topic is Discussed in <br />the EIR <br />California Department <br />of Justice <br />Priority should be placed on avoiding land use conflicts <br />between warehouses and sensitive receptors and on <br />mitigating the impacts of any unavoidable land use <br />conflicts. However, even projects located far from <br />sensitive receptors may contribute to harmful regional <br />air pollution, so you should consider measures to <br />reduce emissions associated with the project to help <br />the State meet its air quality goals. A distant warehouse <br />may also impact sensitive receptors if trucks must pass <br />near sensitive receptors to visit the warehouse. <br />The potential air quality impacts of <br />the project are evaluated in the <br />Initial Study. The Initial Study is <br />provided as Appendix A to this EIR. <br />California Department <br />of Toxic Substances <br />Control <br />Surveys should be conducted for lead-based paint and <br />products, mercury, asbestos containing materials, and <br />polychlorinated biphenyl caulk prior to demolition of <br />buildings and structures. Removal, demolition, and <br />disposal of the above-mentioned chemicals should be <br />conducted in compliance with California environmental <br />regulations and policies. <br />Potential impacts of the project <br />associated with hazardous <br />materials, including chemicals <br />mentioned in this comment, are <br />evaluated in Section 4.2, Hazards <br />and Hazardous Materials. <br />California Department <br />of Toxic Substances <br />Control <br />Imported soil and fill material should be tested to <br />ensure any contaminants of concern are within <br />approved screening levels for the intended land use. To <br />minimize the possibility of introducing contaminated <br />soil and fill material there should be documentation of <br />the origins of the soil or fill material and, if applicable, <br />sampling be conducted to ensure that the imported soil <br />and fill material meets screening levels for the intended <br />land use. The soil sampling should include analysis <br />based on the source of the fill and knowledge of the <br />prior land use. <br />The proposed project does not <br />include importing fill material. <br />California Department <br />of Toxic Substances <br />Control <br />Prior to new buildings being constructed on site, a <br />Remedial Action Plan amendment will be required to <br />evaluate the soil vapor impacts and vapor intrusion risk. <br />While a vapor mitigation system has been discussed for <br />the site, the system cannot be installed before the <br />completion of the Remedial Action Plan amendment. <br />The potential impacts related to <br />soil vapor intrusion are evaluated <br />in Section 4.2, Hazards and <br />Hazardous Materials. Section 4.2, <br />Hazards and Hazardous Materials, <br />also identifies mitigation measures <br />for impacts related to soil vapor <br />intrusion. <br />California Department <br />of Transportation – <br />Aeronautics Program <br />The project site is primarily in Safety Zone 4 (Outer <br />Approach/Departure Zone), with a portion in Zone 6 <br />(Traffic Pattern Zone) of the Oakland International <br />Airport and therefore must adhere to the safety criteria <br />and restrictions defined in the Airport Land Use <br />Compatibility Plan (ALUCP) formed by the ALUC <br />pursuant to the PUC, Section 21674. Warehouse and <br />office space square footage per person should be <br />further reviewed to adhere to consistency with the <br />ALUCP and Table 3-2 of the ALUCP. Section 3.3.2.7. <br />should also be reviewed to ensure compatibility with <br />development criteria. <br />This comment does not directly <br />pertain to environmental impacts <br />evaluated under CEQA. However, <br />the City recognizes the importance <br />of adhering to the Airport Land Use <br />Compatibility Plan. The Alameda <br />County Community Development <br />Agency, Planning Department <br />(ALUC) also provided a written <br />comment in response to the NOP. <br />In that letter the ALUC indicates <br />that warehouses are a compatible <br />use within Safety Zone 4 assuming <br />certain restrictions on the number <br />of employees on-site.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.