My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8B Public
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2025
>
Packet 20250505
>
8B Public
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2025 9:28:03 AM
Creation date
9/15/2025 10:35:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
Document Date (6)
5/5/2025
Retention
Perm
Document Relationships
Reso 2025-042 Rejecting Appeal (880 Doolittle)
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2025
Reso 2025-043 Certifying EIR (880 Doolittle)
(Amended)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5995
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of San Leandro <br />880 Doolittle Drive Industrial Project <br /> <br />1-8 <br />1.3 Scope and Content <br />This EIR addresses impacts identified by the Initial Study to be potentially significant. The following <br />issues were found to include potentially significant impacts and have been studied in the EIR: <br /> Greenhouse Gas Emissions <br /> Hazards and Hazardous Materials <br /> Noise <br /> Transportation <br />In preparing the EIR, use was made of pertinent City policies and guidelines, certified EIRs and <br />adopted CEQA documents, and other background documents. A full reference list is contained in <br />Section 7, References and Preparers. <br />The alternatives section of the EIR (Section 5) was prepared in accordance with Section 15126.6 of <br />the CEQA Guidelines and focuses on a range of reasonable alternatives that are capable of <br />eliminating or reducing significant adverse effects associated with the project while feasibly <br />attaining most of the basic project objectives. In addition, the alternatives section identifies the <br />“environmentally superior” alternative among the alternatives assessed. The alternatives evaluated <br />include the CEQA-required “No Project” alternative and two alternative development scenarios for <br />the project site. <br />The level of detail contained throughout this EIR is consistent with the requirements of CEQA and <br />applicable court decisions. Section 15151 of the CEQA Guidelines provides the standard of adequacy <br />on which this document is based. The CEQA Guidelines state: <br />An EIR should be prepared with a sufficient degree of analysis to provide decisionmakers with <br />information which enables them to make a decision which intelligently takes account of <br />environmental consequences. An evaluation of the environmental effects of the proposed <br />project need not be exhaustive, but the sufficiency of an EIR is to be reviewed in light of what is <br />reasonably feasible. Disagreement among experts does not make an EIR inadequate, but the EIR <br />should summarize the main points of disagreement among the experts. The courts have looked <br />not for perfection, but for adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure. <br />1.4 Issues Not Studied in Detail in the EIR <br />Table 1-2 lists the environmental resource areas that were addressed in the Initial Study <br />(Appendix A). A full analysis of each resource area listed in Table 1-2 can be found in Appendix A. As <br />indicated in the Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the proposed project may have a <br />significant impact on the environment in any of these issue areas, either with or without mitigation, <br />depending on the specific impact.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.