My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Reso 2026-021 Discipline - Councilmember Aguilar
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Resolutions
>
2026
>
Reso 2026-021 Discipline - Councilmember Aguilar
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2026 9:42:18 AM
Creation date
3/4/2026 9:37:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Resolution
Document Date (6)
3/2/2026
Retention
PERM
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
597
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />22 <br /> <br /> Aguilar claimed that Lopez told him that Cameron was rude towards a reporter from the <br />Telemundo television network -- that Cameron “was dismissive and wouldn’t give the reporter <br />the time of day.” Aguilar conceded that he did not know what transpired between Cameron and <br />the reporter and was unaware of the City’s policy prohibiting staff from speaking to reporters. <br /> <br /> Simon explained that he had advocated for Eric Engelbart for the City Manager position <br />because he was talented and sharp. However, when questioned about whether he was familiar <br />with Engelbart’s qualifications for the position, he conceded that he had not bothered to review <br />Engelbart’s resume or performance evaluations before he recommended that Engelbart be <br />considered. When queried about whether he ever discussed with Engelbart if he was interested <br />in the position, Simon stated that he could not remember if he did. He also did not even know <br />Engelbart’s title at the time or the fact that he was working in a position that was two levels <br />below that of the City Manager. He also could not recall what information he had received or <br />reviewed about Cameron’s background or qualifications before he made his recommendation. <br /> <br /> When queried about whether other City Council Members had discussed their <br />experiences working with Engelbart, he initially responded that he did not recall discussing this <br />subject with them but then acknowledged that Viveros-Walton did not have positive feedback <br />about her experiences working with Engelbart. Despite this, he persisted in advocating for <br />Engelbart to be considered. <br /> <br /> Simon also stated that he did not recall whether he discussed with Engelbart his interest <br />(or lack thereof) in the City Manager position before Simon put forth Engelbart’s name to be <br />considered. Simon tried to justify his decision to push forward with Engelbart even if he was not <br />ready to undertake the role by explaining that Engelbart may have simply “needed a nudge” <br />towards advancing his career.15 Simon never bothered to 1) review Engelbart’s qualifications <br />for the position or compare them with Cameron’s; 2) examine Engelbart’s management <br />experience, skills, or abilities and his suitability for the position; or 3) gauge Engelbart’s interest <br />in the position or capacity to take on the role before he proposed that Engelbart be considered <br />for City Manager. Therefore, Simon presented no legitimate basis for his pushing the City <br />Council to consider Engelbart, who told members of the City Council that he was not interested <br />in pursuing the position due to his family obligations. <br /> <br /> Simon also claimed that an email from Tiffany Treece, who was an Environmental <br />Services Coordinator, raised concerns about the City’s lack of compliance with hazardous <br />materials protocols or regulations. He claimed that afterwards, Treece was reprimanded in the <br />Plant Manager’s Office “at Janelle [Cameron’s] direction.” <br /> <br /> An examination of the emails as quoted above reveals there is no reference in Tiffany <br />Treece’s email to her being disciplined at Cameron’s direction. Indeed, there is no record in her <br />personnel file of any disciplinary action that was taken against Treece. Further, there is no <br />reference in Treece’s email to a reprimand for identifying City facilities that were allegedly out of <br />compliance with respect to hazardous waste. Simon never bothered to discuss this incident <br />with Cameron or to verify the accuracy of this account. Yet, he claimed that this incident raised <br />concerns about Cameron’s ability to lead and explains why he voted “no” when she was being <br />considered for the Interim City Manager position. <br /> <br /> Cameron stated that she always supports whistleblowers and had never received the <br />email from Treece so had no knowledge that Treece or anyone else had ever been subjected to <br />disciplinary action as a result of Treece’s email. Cameron produced a November 15, 2023, <br />email she received from Treece raising concerns about her communications with the Plant <br />Manager, who she accuses of mischaracterizing messages and attributing them to Cameron as <br />the source. Since Treece was never disciplined and there is no evidence Cameron was behind <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br /> <br />Exhibit A <br />Resolution No. 2026-021 Page 22
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.