Laserfiche WebLink
ADDENDUM TO SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT <br />BETWEEN <br />THE CITY OF OAKLAND, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ACTING BY AND <br />THROUGH TTS BOARD OF PORT COMMISSIONERS <br />AND <br />THE CITY OF SAN LEANDRO <br />This Addendum Agreement, entered into on November 15, 2004 amends the Settlement <br />Agreement between the City of Oakland, a municipal corporation acting by and through its Board of <br />Port Commissioners ("Port") and the City of San Leandro ("City") dated November 7, 2000 ("2000 <br />Settlement Agreement"). The parties to this Addendum Agreement are referred to collectively as the <br />"Parties." <br />RECITALS <br />A. On November 7, 2000 the Port and the City entered into a settlement agreement to <br />resolve disputes between them regarding the Port's approval of an Airport Development Program <br />("ADP") and the expansion of Oakland International Airport ("Airport"). <br />B. On July 22, 2003, the Port and the City entered into an Addendum to Settlement <br />Agreement for the purpose of providing additional consideration and executing earlier than required <br />some of the terms of the 2000 Settlement Agreement. <br />C. The Environmental Impact Report for the ADP dated December 1997 ("1997 EIR") <br />evaluated aworst-case scenario in which pilots of certain passenger commercial aircraft would <br />choose to land at the Airport's North Field in order to avoid projected delay and congestion on the air <br />carver runway at the Airport's South Field. To reduce the chance of significant impacts on San <br />Leandro residents from the occurrence of such a worst case scenario, the 1997 EIR identified the <br />following mitigation measure: "The Port of Oakland would take actions necessary to acconunodate <br />projected commercial jet aircraft arrivals on Runway 27L in 2010 rather than on Runway 27R, for <br />the purpose of shifting the projected 65 CNEL contour from the I-880 corridor, where residential <br />uses are located, to the west where land uses are generally industrial." The 1997 EIR explained that <br />some of the steps that would be needed to implement this measure would be to "undertake feasibility <br />studies" and to "install an instrument landing system for Runway 27L." <br />D. Section 8 of the 2000 Settlement Agreement provides "The Port shall relocate the <br />Instrument Landing,System {"ILS"), or such other current state-of--the-art system performing the <br />functions of the ILS, from Runway 27R to Runway 27L as soon as reasonably practicable after the <br />Obligations Effective Date and the Port is legally permitted to implement the ADP and relocate the <br />ILS, or such other state-of--the-art system. Upon the reasonable written request from time-to-time by <br />the City the Port shall provide the City with a progress reports sic] on the relocation." <br />E. Subsequently, the Port reevaluted ADP-related operations in a Final Supplemental <br />Environmental Impact Report dated December 2003 ("2003 SEIR"). The 2003 SEIR no longer <br />included the assumption that pilots of passenger commercial aircraft would choose to land at the <br />Airport's North Field. The 2003 SEIR states "This assumption was changed due to the decrease in <br />projected arrivals and departures under all scenarios and following an analysis performed for the <br />FAA demonstrating that Runway ~ 1/29 would not be as congested as previously assumed." Without <br />