Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Joint BZAlPC Worksession Minutes <br />Agenda No. 07-12 <br /> <br />June 28, 2007 <br />Page 5016 <br /> <br />Board Member Daly asked whether there is an estimate or an expectation of what <br />percentage of the housing will be owner-occupied versus rentals. <br /> <br />Secretar"y Livermore replied that we can look only at what the market has been <br />providing. Because this plan does not involve eminent domain, the property owners are in <br />charge of their destiny. In the past, the private sector has produced mostly owner- <br />occupied units, but that does not rule out apartments. Townhomes might be more likely <br />immediately adjacent to existing residential areas, with condominiums more likely in <br />higher-density areas. The San Leandro Inclusionary Housing Ordinance will apply to any <br />developments, meaning that they will have to offer 15% affordable units, with the <br />remaining 85% at market rates. <br /> <br />Acting Chair/Vice Chair Dlugosh wanted to know whether individual future <br />developments would require individual Environmental Impact Reports, or whether they <br />would be covered by the TaD Strategy's EIR once it is approved. <br /> <br />Secretary Livermore replied that the need for individual EIRs will depend on the <br />development. If the impacts have been addressed for the opportunity sites (residential, <br />office and retail), no EIR would be needed, but if a proposal incorporates a potential <br />impact that the TaD Strategy EIR has not analyzed, either a supplemental EIR or a <br />mitigated negative declaration might be necessary. She indicated, too, that one of the <br />positive aspects of the TOD Strategy, which came out at the developers' symposium, and <br />which might promote development in the area, is the fact that it removes a lot of <br />uncertainty and provides a degree of environmental clearance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Finberg pointed out the diversity of the CAC membership, which was <br />representative of all the districts, and included a whole new group of people who aren't <br />necessarily usually involved but came forward for this. There was never a problem <br />reaching quorum; the whole group attended meetings 75-80% of the time. No stones went <br />untumed. She said that the TaD Strategy project has been one of the most inclusive with <br />which she has ever been involved. <br /> <br />Secretary Livermore agreed, and added that one of the meetings was so long that it went <br />until 1 0 p.m. <br /> <br />Board Member Gilcrest noted one area in which TOD Strategy recommendations might <br />be contradictory. He pointed out that in one place, the former Daly Chevrolet property on <br />at Alvarado and Davis Streets appears as a site with potential for a development with no <br />height limit, but in another place that site is identified as having potential as a satellite <br />parking site. He asked whether a high-rise is anticipated there, or what? <br /> <br />Secretary Livermore said that both options are among the TOD Strategy goals, and <br />either of those options could play an important role in implementation. Rather than being <br />contradictory, she said, the options represent two different possibilities. She said the <br />replacement for current BART parking could provide shared parking for residential <br />development on the west side of the station. <br /> <br />There were no further questions or comments from Board Members and Commissioners <br />at this time. <br />