Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The City of San Leandro also finds that as to such significant effects identified above: <br /> <br />Specific economic, legal, social, technological or other considerations, make infeasible project <br />alternatives identified in the EIR. <br /> <br />Basis for Findings: <br /> <br />III. FEASIBILITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF AL TERNA TIVES <br /> <br />The CEQA Guidelines require the description and comparative analysis of a range of <br />alternatives, including the No Project Alternative, to the proposed Strategy that could feasibly <br />attain the objectives of the proposed strategy. The characteristics, impacts, and feasibility of each <br />of the four alternatives to the proposed project that were evaluated in detail in the Final EIR are <br />discussed below. <br /> <br />The City of San Leandro considered four alternatives to the proposed project in the Final EIR. <br />Alternatives to the proposed project evaluated in the Final EIR included: (1) No Project <br />Alternative; (2) Mixed Use Land Use Concept 2 Alternative-Residential Emphasis with High <br />Intensity Downtown Retail; (3) Mixed Use Land Use Concept 3 Mixed Office Residential with <br />Modest Downtown Retail; and (4) a CMA Land Use Model for CMP Analysis Alternative. <br /> <br />The project alternatives that were analyzed in the TOD Strategy EIR are as follows: <br /> <br />A. Alternatives to the Proposed Project <br /> <br />Alternative 1: No Project Alternative with the Existing General Plan <br /> <br />Description of Alternative 1: Under this alternative, which is required under CEQA, the <br />proposed project would not be constructed and the site would be redeveloped per the current <br />General Plan and zoning code. The No Project Alternative for the purposes ofthis EIR assumes <br />that development within the TOD Strategy Area, as well as throughout the remainder of the City <br />would occur as currently allowed by the City's existing General Plan and zoning code. The <br />extent of potential development that could occur within this regulatory framework is described <br />below. <br /> <br />There are currently 12 General Plan land use designations within the TOD Strategy Area, as <br />shown in Table 4.7-1 of the Land Use Chapter. There are also 12 zoning designations <br />overlapping with the Strategy Area, which are also specified in Chapter 4.7 and shown in Figure <br />4.7-2. As shown in Table 3-2 of the Project Description, it is estimated that buildout under the <br />existing General Plan and zoning code through 2015 would include 590 dwelling units, 781,200 <br />square feet of office, and 195,300 square feet of retail. This level of growth would result in <br />1,527 and 2,790 new people residing and working in the TOD Strategy Area, respectively. <br /> <br />In order to effectively evaluate these growth projections in relation to the TOD Strategy, it was <br />necessary to compare them to the growth projections for the TOD Strategy buildout year (2030). <br />An alternative approach would have been to calculate reduced (30 percent) projections for <br /> <br />30 <br />