3B Public Hearing 2009 0720 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Cornerstone at San Leandro Crossings Initial Study 25 March 2009 Public Services Impacts (Continued) POTENTIALLY California Senate Bill 50 (SB 50). The passage of SB 50 in 1998 defined the Needs Analysis process in Government Code Sections 65995.5 to 65998, thus providing the requirements that a school district must articulate when identifying expansion ISSUES POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT LESS THAN NO square footage of residential, commercial/industrial, and/or parking structure uses. Level Two fees require the developer to SIGNIFICANT UNLESS SIGNIFICANT IMPACT SOURCES ISSUES MITIGATION IMPACT imposition of the Level Three fees for the foreseeable future. Therefore, once qualified, districts may impost only Level Two fees as calculated according to SB 50. INCORPORATED As evaluated in the TOD Strategy ETR that was certified in September 2007, new development occurring under the TOD Strategy would be required to follow the Policies and Mitigation Measures Master List of the Development and Cornerstone at San Leandro Crossings Initial Study 25 March 2009 Public Services Impacts (Continued) California Senate Bill 50 (SB 50). The passage of SB 50 in 1998 defined the Needs Analysis process in Government Code Sections 65995.5 to 65998, thus providing the requirements that a school district must articulate when identifying expansion programs. Under the provisions of SB 50, school districts may collect fees to offset the costs associated with increasing school capacity as a result of developments. The fees- referred to as Level One fees -are assessed based upon the proposed square footage of residential, commercial/industrial, and/or parking structure uses. Level Two fees require the developer to provide one-half of the costs of accommodating students in new schools, while the state would provide the other half. Level Three fees require the development to pay the full cost of accommodating the students in new schools and would be implemented at the time the funds available from Proposition 1A (approved by the voters in 1998) are expended. School districts must demonstrate to the state their long-term facilities needs and costs based on long-term population growth in order to qualify for this source of funding. However, voter approval of Proposition 55 on March 2004, precludes the imposition of the Level Three fees for the foreseeable future. Therefore, once qualified, districts may impost only Level Two fees as calculated according to SB 50. As evaluated in the TOD Strategy ETR that was certified in September 2007, new development occurring under the TOD Strategy would be required to follow the Policies and Mitigation Measures Master List of the Development and Implementation Guidelines chapter within the TOD Strategy document that incorporates various General Plan Policies and Mitigation Measures. Mitigation Measure #30: The minimum levels of service standards for police and fire response times shall be maintained in accordance with General Plan Policy 45.01. Mitigation Measure #31: The applicant shall incorporate lighting, landscaping and other design features that reduce the potential for crime and facilitate rapid response to emergency calls in accordance with General Plan Policy 45.06. Mitigation Measure #32: The applicant shall pay all developer fees required by the San Leandro Unified School District at the time of building permits. 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. 'Would theproject: a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of X 3, 4, 8 the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new X 3, 4, 8 water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new X 3, 4, 8 storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to X 3, 4, 8 serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater X 3, 4, 8 treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Cornerstone at San Leandro Crossings Initial Study 25 March 2009