Laserfiche WebLink
f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted <br />POTENTIALLY <br />X <br />3, 4, 8 <br />ISSUES <br />POTENTIALLY <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />LESS THAN <br />NO <br />waste disposal needs? <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />UNLESS <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />IMPACT <br />SOURCES <br />g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes <br />ISSUES <br />MITIGATION <br />IMPACT <br />3, 4, 8 <br />and regulations related to solid waste? <br />INCORPORATED <br />f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted <br />X <br />3, 4, 8 <br />capacity to accommodate the project's solid <br />waste disposal needs? <br />g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes <br />X <br />3, 4, 8 <br />and regulations related to solid waste? <br />h.. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes <br />X <br />3, 4, 8 <br />and regulations related to discharge of storm <br />waters? <br />EXPLANATION: <br />a -h) Because the proposed project would result in greater residential population and vehicular traffic at the project site, it is <br />expected that demand for public utilities would increase. Depending on the existing and planned capacities to be <br />available, the proposed project could necessitate the alteration or construction of water, wastewater, or solid waste <br />facilities resulting in a potentially significant impact. As identified in the Downtown TOD Strategy EIR (September <br />2007), implementation of the project could result in adverse impacts on water supply. <br />Mitigation Measure #33: The applicant shall promote the efficient use of existing water supplies through a <br />variety of water conservation measures, including the use of recycled water for landscaping in accordance with <br />General Plan Policy 27.02. <br />Mitigation Measure #34: The applicant shall conserve water through the use of such measures as low -flow <br />plumbing fixtures and water -saving appliances in accordance with General Plan Policy 27.04. <br />Mitigation Measure #35: The applicant shall be required to pay its fair share of the cost of improving the <br />water, sewer, drainage and other infrastructure systems needed to serve the development through use fees or <br />other appropriate forms of mitigation in accordance with General Plan Policy 52.02. <br />There are no new impacts beyond what was analyzed in the Downtown San Leandro TOD Strategy EIR (2007). <br />13. RE'CREA:TION. <br />a. Would the project increase the use of existing <br />X <br />3, 4, 9 <br />neighborhood and regional parks or other <br />recreational facilities such that substantial <br />physical deterioration of the facility would occur <br />or be accelerated? <br />b. Does the project include recreational facilities or <br />X <br />3, 4, 9 <br />require the construction or expansion of <br />recreational facilities which might have an <br />adverse physical effect on the environment? <br />EXPLANATION: <br />a -h) Because the proposed project could result in greater residential population at the project site, it is expected that <br />demand for parks and recreational facilities could increase. Depending on the existing use and condition of local <br />parks and related recreational facilities, the proposed project could necessitate the expansion or construction of park - <br />related resources which could result in a potentially significant impact. <br />Mitigation Measure #36: The applicant shall pay an impact fee and/or dedicate parkland to offset the increase in <br />park needs resulting from the proposed project. Where on-site parkland is dedicated, it should be improved, <br />maintained, and accessible to the general public in accordance with General Plan Policy 22.02. <br />There are no new impacts beyond what was analyzed in the Downtown San Leandro TOD Strategy EIR (2007). <br />Cornerstone at San Leandro Crossings Initial Study 26 March 2009 <br />