My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
3B Public Hearing 2009 0720
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2009
>
Packet 2009 0720
>
3B Public Hearing 2009 0720
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2019 8:29:34 AM
Creation date
7/17/2009 9:57:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
7/20/2009
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
_CC Agenda 2009 0720
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Agenda Packets\2009\Packet 2009 0720
MO 2009-036
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Minute Orders\2009
Reso 2009-107
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14. <br />AESTHETICS. Would the project. - <br />POTENTIALLY <br />Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic <br />ISSUES <br />POTENTIALLY <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />LESS THAN <br />NO <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />UNLESS <br />SIGNIFICANT <br />IMPACT <br />SOURCES <br />ISSUES <br />MITIGATION <br />IMPACT <br />2, 3, 4, 9 <br />including, but not limited to, trees, rock <br />INCORPORATED <br />14. <br />AESTHETICS. Would the project. - <br />a, <br />Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic <br />X <br />2, 3, 4, 9 <br />vista? <br />b. <br />Substantially damage scenic resources, <br />X <br />2, 3, 4, 9 <br />including, but not limited to, trees, rock <br />outcroppings, and historic buildings within a <br />state scenic highway? <br />C. <br />Substantially degrade the existing visual <br />X <br />2, 3, 4, 9 <br />character or quality of the site and its <br />surroundings? <br />d. <br />Create a new source of substantial light or glare <br />X <br />2, 3, 4, 9 <br />which would adversely affect day or nighttime <br />views in the area? <br />e. <br />Create significant shadow effects on adjacent <br />X <br />2, 3, 4, 9 <br />buildin s? <br />EXPLANATION: <br />Sites 1 and 2 are located in a relatively flat area of downtown San Leandro. The visual setting is characterized by one- to <br />four-story residential, one- to two- story commercial office and light industrial buildings, as well as the BART Station <br />and overhead tracks. Site 1 has been previously graded and disturbed and is presently an at -grade asphalt parking lot. <br />Site 2 is a vacant lot surrounded by a commercial office building to the north, industrial uses to the south, light industrial <br />to the west and the San Leandro BART Station and associated parking lots to the east. There is limited, natural <br />landscaping in the project vicinity. Site 1 is visually screened by the presence of mature landscaping around the property <br />perimeter. A small cluster of mature trees occur along the easterly and westerly edges of Site 2 along Alvarado Streets <br />and Martinez Streets. <br />There is limited ornamental landscaping in the form of mature trees surrounding adjacent buildings and in adjacent <br />parking lots. Site 1 is visible from San Leandro Boulevard on the west, as well as from the surrounding roadways and <br />from the existing multi -family residential development to the east (Pacific Plaza Condominiums). <br />Views from the west -facing condominiums will be affected, as views west towards the existing at -grade BART parking <br />lot are replaced with a new, four-story multi -family development project which will change the visual landscape. <br />However, existing views are limited to primarily existing development, therefore, the proposed project will not alter <br />views from existing residences towards any significant scenic resources or vistas, therefore visual impacts will not be <br />significant. Site 2 is visible from San Leandro Boulevard on the east, as well as from surrounding roadways and adjacent <br />development. Distant views to and from the project site are limited due the flat topography and the presence of existing <br />development. However, the East Bay Hills are visible from some areas of the project site beyond the BART Station. The <br />project site would be visible to BART riders as they passed the project site from the BART trains leaving and entering the <br />San Leandro BART Station. <br />There are no designated scenic vistas or scenic resources on or adjacent to the project area. Accordingly, the proposed <br />project would have no impact on scenic resources nor damage scenic resources within a state scenic highway. <br />b-c)The proposed project could change the visual character and quality of the project site, which is currently underutilized <br />(Site 1) and vacant (Site 2). The project site is currently surrounded by a mixture of low and medium rise residential <br />buildings and low-rise light industrial and commercial buildings. Development of the project site would introduce more <br />intensive uses, thereby introducing visual elements and features that will change the existing visual landscape. <br />Mitigation Measure #37: The applicant shall be required to go through the City of San Leandro Site Plan Review <br />process to ensure that the design for the proposed project is compatible with and consistent with the various <br />architectural styles and character of downtown San Leandro, in accordance with General Plan Policy 42.04. <br />Cornerstone at San Leandro Crossings Initial Study 27 March 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.