Laserfiche WebLink
Summary of Public Comments, with Responses <br />Comments were received from the public via email and public comments during the <br />City Council and Planning Commission work sessions on November g and November <br />ig, zoog, respectively. Responses are provided by City staff, in conjunction with KEMA, <br />the energy consultant for the Climate Action Plan (CAP) <br />Need to make a more ambitious goal than i5 percent by zozo <br />Council adopted this goal in February zoo7, at the recommendation of a regional <br />consortium Alameda County Climate Protection Project. The current goal may be <br />difficult to attain given current staffing levels, but the intention is to not only obtain but <br />surpass this goal. The recent proposal by the Obama administration is along the same <br />lines (17% by zozo.) <br />Seal Level Rise should be considered in the CAP <br />A Climate Adaptation Plan is a separate effort from the CAP. The City is involved in a <br />region wide discussion of adaptation efforts, including participation in the Hayward <br />Area Shoreline Planning Agency (HASPA) Sea-Level Rise discussions. <br />Would like to see a ban on gasoline-fueled blowers <br />The Air District is considering such a ban, which would be region-wide. Given current <br />staff levels, a ban is not being considered at this time. <br />Be aware of two Assembly Bills (sio3 and 758), which will require Energy Star <br />benchmarking on commercial buildings and higher energy performance standards, <br />respectively. <br />The City is monitoring State developments on these issues, particularly through the <br />efforts of the Chief Building Official, William Schock, who is the California Building <br />Official representative on the California Green Building Code Advisory Committee. <br />PV technology is getting much better- look at cutting edge solutions like thin film <br />solar, solar paint, etc. and potentially locate PV at the Marina redevelopment <br />The Climate Action Plan is not specifying any particular type of solar technology. The <br />feasibility scores from the Cost Benefit Analysis for PV are currently low, but the <br />feasibility will continue to be evolving as technology improves and prices come down. <br />(See also Reponses to City Council and Planning Commission for discussion of <br />prioritization of energy efficiency over solar power at this time.) <br />