My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
8G Consent Calendar 2018 0220
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2018
>
Packet 2018 0220
>
8G Consent Calendar 2018 0220
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2018 1:44:54 PM
Creation date
2/14/2018 1:44:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
2/20/2018
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2018-011
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) (if <br />necessary). <br />The report shall support the Section 404 permit application and the USACE’s federal <br />Endangered Species Act (FESA) Section 7 consultation with the USFWS (and NMFS if <br />appropriate) regarding potential direct and indirect impacts on federally listed species from the <br />proposed activities. The BA shall address the potential for project activities to result in “take” of <br />listed species and modification of their habitat. For the purpose of the BA, no protocol-level <br />surveys shall be conducted. Rather, the potential for occurrence of listed species shall be <br />determined based on an assessment of habitat conditions on the site, proximity to areas of known <br />occurrence, and presence or absence of barriers to dispersal to the site from nearby areas of <br />known occurrence. In addition, the BA shall support acquisition of an incidental take permit <br />from the CDFW, if necessary, to ensure compliance with the California Endangered Species Act <br />(CESA). <br /> <br />Deliverables: Draft Biological Assessment (electronic) <br /> Final Biological Assessment (electronic) <br /> <br />Meetings: Site visit to conduct biological habitat assessment (one field day) <br /> <br />7.3 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Compliance <br />Consultant shall prepare a cultural resources report that is compliant with Section 106 of the <br />NHPA. The report shall include an Area of Potential Effects (APE) map that depicts all <br />construction work areas and staging areas. Consultant shall conduct background research for <br />cultural resources by conducting a record search at the California Historic Resources Information <br />System (CHRIS). The Native American Heritage Commission shall also be contacted to <br />determine whether Native American sacred sites are known to be located in or near the sites and <br />to request a list of contacts for Native American tribes who may be interested in the Project. A <br />field survey shall be conducted by Consultant’s cultural resources specialists. The report shall <br />document all findings from the field investigation. The cultural resources report shall also be <br />submitted to the Northwest Information Center of the CHRIS. <br /> <br />Deliverables: Draft Section 106 Report (electronic) <br /> Revised Section 106 Report (electronic) <br /> <br />Meetings: Site visit to conduct biological habitat assessment (one field day) <br /> <br /> <br />7.4 San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission <br />Consultant shall prepare a permit application for compliance with the California McAteer-Petris <br />Act, federal Coastal Zone Management Act, and the San Francisco Bay Plan for placement of <br />Bay fill that BCDC has regulatory authority over. Consultant shall coordinate with the City and <br />BCDC to determine whether proposed activities may be considered a “minor improvement” and <br />qualify for an Administrative Permit, or require a Major Permit. Consultant shall prepare and <br />submit a draft version of the application documents for review by the City. Based on City <br />comments, the application package will be revised by Consultant and submitted to BCDC, or by <br />the City, for consideration. <br />1123
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.