My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
5A Public Hearings 2020 0302
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2020
>
Packet 2020 0302
>
5A Public Hearings 2020 0302
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2020 5:22:10 PM
Creation date
2/25/2020 5:13:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Agenda
Document Date (6)
3/2/2020
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Reso 2020-021
(Reference)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
978
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
<br /> 116 <br /> <br />2. Maximum of One Story. A maximum of one story is permitted in the RS-VP Sub- <br />District, except that the improvement of a basement or space below an existing <br />habitable story (i.e., construction of a new habitable story within the building enve- <br />lope of a pre-existing structure) is exempt from this one story limitation. <br /> <br />C. Exceptions to Height Restrictions of the RS-VP Sub-District. <br /> <br />1. Exceptions Authorized. The Board of Zoning Adjustments is authorized to grant <br />Exceptions to the height limits of the RS-VP Sub-District, up to a height not to <br />exceed the 30 feet height limit of the base RS District. Construction in excess of <br />the base RS District’s limit of 30 feet is subject to approval of both an Exception, <br />as authorized by this section, and a Variance pursuant to the requirements of <br />Chapter 5.08 Use Permits, Variances, and Parking Exceptions. <br /> <br />2. Required Finding for Granting of an Exception. To approve an Exception to the <br />height limit of the RS-VP Sub-District, the decision-making body shall make the <br />following finding: <br /> <br />a. Mandatory Finding—The Views Currently Enjoyed by Neighbors Are Re- <br />tained. The proposed construction that is in excess of the height limit of the <br />RS-VP Sub-District does not unreasonably block or diminish neighbors’ views <br />of distant and scenic features, such as the San Francisco Bay and surround- <br />ing open spaces and skylines, to any greater degree than would a proposal <br />for construction that conformed to the height limits of the RS-VP Sub-District. <br /> <br />b. Mandatory Denial. Failure to make the required finding under (a) shall require <br />denial of the application for an Exception made under this section. <br /> <br />3. Notice, Review and Appeal Process. Requests for granting of an Exception shall <br />be made concurrently with, and have the same noticing requirements as, an appli- <br />cation for MAJOR View Preservation/Site Plan Review as specified in Subsection <br />D, below. <br /> <br />D. View Preservation/Site Plan Review. <br /> <br />1. Applicability. The requirements of this section apply to the following Single-family <br />construction projects in the RS-VP Sub-District: <br /> <br />a. Requirement for MAJOR View Preservation/Site Plan Review. MAJOR View <br />Preservation/Site Plan approval is required prior to issuance of a building per- <br />mit for either: <br /> <br />i. New Home: A new single-family home; or <br /> <br />City Council Hearing March 2, 2020 154
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.