My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
11A Public Hearings
CityHall
>
City Clerk
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
2022
>
Packet 05022022
>
11A Public Hearings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2022 4:06:05 PM
Creation date
5/10/2022 4:01:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CM City Clerk-City Council
CM City Clerk-City Council - Document Type
Staff Report
Document Date (6)
5/2/2022
Retention
PERM
Document Relationships
Ord 2022-005 PP Zoning Map Amendment Second Reading
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Ordinances\2022
Reso 2022-068 PD SPR
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Reso 2022-069 Tentative Map 2824 Halcyon Drive
(Approved by)
Path:
\City Clerk\City Council\Resolutions\2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Checklist <br />Aesthetics <br />Environmental Consistency Checklist Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 19 <br />1 Aesthetics <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Less Than <br />Significant or <br />Less than <br />Significant with <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />No <br />Impact <br />Analyzed <br />in the <br />Prior EIR <br />Substantially <br />Mitigated by <br />Uniformly <br />Applicable <br />Development <br />Policies <br />Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: <br />a.Have a substantial adverse effect <br />on a scenic vista?□□ ■■ □ <br />b.Substantially damage scenic <br />resources, including but not <br />limited to, trees, rock <br />outcroppings, and historic <br />buildings within a state scenic <br />highway?□□ ■■ □ <br />c.In non-urbanized areas, <br />substantially degrade the existing <br />visual character or quality of <br />public views of the site and its <br />surroundings? (Public views are <br />those that are experienced from <br />publicly accessible vantage <br />point). If the project is in an <br />urbanized area, would the project <br />conflict with applicable zoning <br />and other regulations governing <br />scenic quality?□■□■□ <br />d.Create a new source of <br />substantial light or glare that <br />would adversely affect daytime <br />or nighttime views in the area?□□ □■ ■ <br />Analysis in Previous Environmental Document <br />Impacts to aesthetics were analyzed on pages 4.1-8 through 4.1-19 of the General Plan EIR. Impacts <br />to aesthetics were determined to be less than significant. <br />The following describes the analysis included in the General Plan EIR (the General Plan EIR) and also <br />provides a streamlined review to determine whether there would be project-specific impacts that <br />are either 1) peculiar to the project or the parcel on which the project is located, 2) were not <br />previously analyzed in the General Plan EIR as significant effects, 3) are potentially significant off-site <br />impacts and cumulative impacts that were not previously discussed in the General Plan EIR, and 4) <br />are now determined to have a more severe impact than discussed in the General Plan EIR due to <br />substantial new information.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.